On the Logic of Iterated Non-prioritised Revision
نویسنده
چکیده
We look at iterated non-prioritised belief revision, using as a starting point a model of non-prioritised revision, similar to Makinson’s screened revision, which assumes an agent keeps a set of core beliefs whose function is to block certain revision inputs. We study postulates for the iteration of this operation. These postulates generalise some of those which have previously been proposed for iterated AGM (“prioritised”) revision, including those of Darwiche and Pearl. We then add a second type of revision operation which allows the core itself to be revised. Postulates for the iteration of this operator are also provided, as are rules governing mixed sequences of revisions consisting of both regular and core inputs. Finally we give a construction of both a regular and core revision operator based on an agent’s revision history. This construction is shown to satisfy most of the postulates.
منابع مشابه
Belief Change in Branching Time: AGM-consistency and Iterated Revision
We study belief change in the branching-time structures introduced in [4]. First, we identify a property of branching-time frames that is equivalent to AGM-consistency, which is defined as follows. A frame is AGM-consistent if the partial belief revision function associated with an arbitrary state-instant pair and an arbitrary model based on that frame can be extended to a full belief revision ...
متن کاملThree Scenarios for the Revision of Epistemic States
This position paper discusses the difficulty of interpreting iterated belief revision in the scope of the existing literature. Axioms of iterated belief revision are often presented as extensions of the AGM axioms, upon receiving a sequence of inputs. More recent inputs are assumed to have priority over less recent ones. We argue that this view of iterated revision is at odds with the claim, ma...
متن کاملA Semantic Approach for Iterated Revision in Possibilistic Logic
In this paper, we propose a new approach for iterated revision in possibilistic logic by applying a one-step revision operator. We first argue that the set of KM postulates for revision is too strong to define a practical one-step revision operator and some of them should be weakened. We then present a semantic approach for iterated revision in possibilistic logic using a one-step revision oper...
متن کاملA conceptual framework for (iterated) revision, update, and nonmonotonic reasoning
This paper makes a foundational contribution to the discussions on the very nature of belief change operations. Belief revision and belief update are investigated within an abstract framework of epistemic states and (qualitative or quantitative) conditionals. Moreover, we distinguish between background knowledge and contextual information in order to analyse belief change more appropriately. Th...
متن کاملIterated Revision in Default Logic
Default logic is supposed to reason with static and consistent default theory, i.e., it can not deal with inconsistencies arising in the situation that an agent receives a sequence of information represented by default theories. To overcome the problem, revision operators for revising default theories have been investigated by many researchers. But none of them has discussed the postulates whic...
متن کامل